Page Heading
Congress Says “No” to EPA in your Backyard
Friday, July 15, 2011 4:00 pm | By Grant Morgan

Despite threats of a veto from the White House, Congress voted 239-184 on Wednesday to ensure that the EPA cannot overrule state decisions on water quality. Sixteen Democrats joined the Republican caucus in supporting the bill.

The bill was drafted in response to an increasingly aggressive approach by the EPA to regulating non-interstate waters. This approach has been opposed by both agricultural and business leaders, as the EPA has recently made unprecedented moves to control agricultural nutrient runoff in Florida and has revoked state-issued permits for mining in West Virginia.

As recently as May, “Draft Guidelines” had been issued to the EPA to radically expand the waters that fall under EPA jurisdiction, prompting political, business, and popular opposition.

A letter signed by 40 House members explained the basis for their opposition:
“When an agency acts to change the rights of an individual, we believe that the agency must go through the formal rulemaking process. We respectfully request you abandon any further action on this guidance document.”

The Property Rights Alliance has long opposed these expansions of EPA power, arguing to the House Transportation and Infrastructure committee in 2010 that the changes “Will not ensure the cleanliness of these waters, but merely serve as another bureaucratic barrier for citizens who wish to use land for development.”

Organizations such as the Heritage Foundation have also noted that these guidelines presented significant problems for property-owners as well as businesses. The simple act of draining or modifying a small pond on your property could, under the proposed changes, provoke EPA intervention. Indeed, Heritage notes that the proposed expansion could: “turn the Clean Water Act into what some analysts believe to be the most dangerous federal intrusion on private property rights in existence.” Indeed, documents supporting the expansion specifically mention the regulation of “mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, natural ponds…” – essentially covering virtually any form of consistent water that a property-owner might have on their land.

The bill passed by the house on Wednesday could stop this expansion of EPA power dead in its tracks. The passage of this bill is a positive step for property rights against government intrusion. The Senate and the White House should take note.

Click here to read PRA comments to the EPA on the draft guidance.

Tags: Enviro Federal | Permalink | Comments

I'm so glad I found my suoltion online.
Kayden / KTusuavoqVWkvGjDH August 1, 2011 1:18 am

In awe of that asnewr! Really cool!
Flip / kxWAydEDsqwkm August 14, 2011 14:26 am

I feel so much hpaeipr now I understand all this. Thanks!
Roxie / wHXOGhrrAJOoXTT August 15, 2011 15:07 am

Need Legal Help, and cannot afford an attorney? Don’t worry there is a free site to help you find affordable legal services. Visit
Ran Rhaine / Philippines April 10, 2012 10:21 am

At last, soemnoe who comes to the heart of it all
Johnelle / yyxkNlztndHMf October 25, 2012 25:37 am

8LH5GW aweuqhevxaca
qjnmukzj / FaAecIriBdv October 25, 2012 25:35 pm

sQ2tX0 , [url=]lrrwwewyaudr[/url], [link=]cbvnrqymjnwj[/link],
xemypbnc / dKvMPptpuiQHIrxIIj October 26, 2012 26:21 pm

tlgZHg woyrvtqwtxnw
wfzlqwxlq / EiEzHATrCWX October 26, 2012 26:41 pm

uN1SSo , [url=]ksvczhxqpmnk[/url], [link=]uqwpedokirij[/link],
cnpurfotily / VEEqWDOvcPvhL October 27, 2012 27:38 am

Just do me a favor and keep writing such trenchant anaysles, OK?
Eucho / symXowRCIBOajNzV June 9, 2013 9:33 pm

5cHDSt bijvxqdgnxrf
ecrmodhaz / DCcPDVLrDkf June 10, 2013 10:04 pm

WdDa3j , [url=]ditaxklpajsk[/url], [link=]fqnvkjyhbhaz[/link],
sashvrqi / WEMotegzqgkr June 13, 2013 13:46 am

от I simply want to say I'm all new to blogs and absueotlly enjoyed you're web-site. Probably I’m going to bookmark your site . You really have good article content. Thanks a bunch for sharing with us your web-site.
Arzu / Ajhugejz October 24, 2015 24:55 pm

A second vote for Vital Choice whole UN-refined Sockeye Salmon oil, with no aivetidds or flavors (unlike Eskimo-3). It would seem to make sense to ingest the natural fish oil. Looks like it contains a bit more EPA and DHA than the Eskimo-3, along with the rest of the full matrix of fatty acids, phospholipids, and antioxidants absent from standard refined fish oils. Taken this for several years with great success.
NepJune / resN89v0 December 29, 2015 29:48 pm

Add a comment
Your email address will not be displayed but will be added to our contact database. If you do not wish us to contact you, please leave that field blank.
Name:     Comment: