Tuesday, April 12, 2011 11:27 am | By Kelsey Zahourek
Today, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution is holding a hearing on H.R. 1433, the "Private Property Rights Protection Act," co-sponsored by Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) and Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA). H.R. 1433 would suspend Federal economic development funds for a period of two fiscal years to any state that takes property through eminent domain for a private purpose. It will also allow private property owners legal recourse to fight private property takings by state and local governments that are used for private purposes.
The letter states:
As a result of the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling in Kelo v. City of New London, the government’s power of eminent domain has become almost limitless, providing victimized citizens with few means to protect their property...
Several states have independently passed legislation to limit their power to eminent domain, and the Supreme Courts of Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio have barred the practice under their state constitutions. This bill will provide American citizens in every state with the means to protect their private property from exceedingly unsubstantiated claims of eminent domain...
Although many states have already acted, Congress must play a pivotal role in reforming the use and abuse of eminent domain.
PRA Releases 2011 International Property Rights Index: U.S. Falls Behind in Rankings
Tuesday, March 22, 2011 8:10 am | By Kelsey Zahourek
The Property Rights Alliance is proud to announce the release of the 2011 International Property Rights Index (IPRI), which measures the intellectual and physical property rights of 129 nations from around the world. This year, sixty-seven international organizations partnered with the Property Rights Alliance in Washington, DC and its Hernando de Soto Fellowship program to produce the fifth annual IPRI.
The IPRI uses three primary areas of property rights to create a composite score: Legal and Political Environment (LP), Physical Property Rights (PPR), and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). Most importantly, the IPRI emphasizes the great economic differences between countries with strong property rights and those without. Nations falling in the first quintile enjoy an average national GDP per capita of $38,350; more than double that of the second quintile with an average of $18,701. The third, fourth, and fifth quintiles average $9,316, $5,065, and $4,785 respectively.
In this year’s report, the United States fell to 18th place with a score of 7.5 out of a possible 10.0. This is the lowest the United States has scored since the reports inception in 2007. According to the report, the most significant decline is seen in the PPR subcomponent, decreasing 0.7 points to a score of 7.1. The United States highest score was in IPR with a score of 8.4.
“In a time of economic turbulence and financial uncertainty, all nations should be seeking solutions that will provide stability. Strong property rights is one key component,” stated PRA executive director Kelsey Zahourek, “While the United States still enjoys fairly strong property rights, its recent decline in the rankings should be cause for concern. From eminent domain abuses in New Jersey and California to new regulations that seek to gain control of the market, actions that weaken America’s property rights foundation pose a serious threat to its economic vitality.”
The International Property Rights Index will provide the public, researchers and policymakers, from across the globe, with a tool for comparative analysis and future research on global property rights. The Index seeks to assist underperforming countries to develop robust economies through an emphasis on sound property law.
To view entire report click here
For more information visit www.internationalpropertyrightsindex.org
PRA Applauds IPEC Legislative Recommendations
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 11:46 am | By Kelsey Zahourek
Today, White House Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (IPEC), Victoria Espinel, released her recommendations for legislation to improve IP enforcement. PRA applauds the Office of the IPEC for their continued work in recognizing the problem counterfeiting and piracy not only poses to jobs and the economy but more importantly, to the health and safety of the public.
Fake products of all kinds are entering the supply chain in record numbers, posing a serious health and safety risk to this country. From tainted pharmaceuticals to substandard airplane parts, counterfeit products continue to cause serious harm to life and physical property. The IPEC’s recommendations focus on increasing the criminal penalties for specific activities that deal with offenses that put the public in danger including: the sale of counterfeited goods to the military, counterfeiting and piracy that is funded by organized crime, and for counterfeit drug offenses.
We also applaud the IPEC’s recommendation that Congress enact a performance right for sound recording. PRA has long been an advocate of the right of performers to collect royalties from broadcasters when their recordings are played on the radio. Under current law, radio broadcasters are allowed to use copyrighted intellectual property without compensation because of the perceived promotional benefit to the owner of the creative work. Satellite, Internet, and Cable broadcasters are not exempt and must pay for the use of music, regardless of any promotional benefit to the artist.